Saturday, October 3, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
ENUSP.ORG
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About us
    • Who are we?
    • Reports
    • Statutes
    • Board members
  • Our association
    • Where do we have influence
    • Our projects
      • Projects
      • Events
    • Members
      • Per country
      • Alphabetical list
      • Q&A
  • Get involved
    • Become a member
    • Become a volunteer/worker/activist
    • Make a donation
  • Contact us
da Dansk es Español fr Français ru Русский en English
  • Home
  • About us
    • Who are we?
    • Reports
    • Statutes
    • Board members
  • Our association
    • Where do we have influence
    • Our projects
      • Projects
      • Events
    • Members
      • Per country
      • Alphabetical list
      • Q&A
  • Get involved
    • Become a member
    • Become a volunteer/worker/activist
    • Make a donation
  • Contact us
No Result
View All Result
ENUSP.ORG
No Result
View All Result
Home Research

Biased reporting example: Children with ADHD have smaller brains (and higher IQ)

OlgaKalina by OlgaKalina
1. July 2017
in Research
0 0
0
0
SHARES
13
VIEWS

Biased reporting example: a study claims that children with ADHD have smaller brains and forgets to highlight the higher IQ scores. Information about the IQ of childen with ADHD can be found only in the appendix of the study, not available in the free version. Media immediately published the news with the headlines “Study Finds Brains of ADHD Sufferers Are Smaller” (Newsweek), “Brains of those with ADHD show smaller structure related to emotion” (CNN). It is not hard to see that such headlines are not going to reduce stigma. Not a single headline mentioned better IQ scores of children with ADHD, a fact that could be quite interesting for discussion and future research as well as for reducing stigma. Imagine the headline: “Study finds children with ADHD have higher IQ scores”. However this fact apparently doesn’t fit into the disease model chosen by the researchers. As for the smaller brain, analysis of the article shows that the study fails to prove the difference. 

OlgaKalina

OlgaKalina

Related Posts

Documentary film on recovery “Tree in Psychiatry”

by OlgaKalina
11. July 2017
1

Recovery, empowerment and experiential expertise. In this documentary (ex-)users and survivors of psychiatry speak about their lived experience from hospitalization to recovery. They discuss what is helpful and what is not helpful at all. Among the most brilliant phrases are: "Insanity is a perfectly...

Service user perspectives on coercion and restraint in mental health

by OlgaKalina
13. August 2017
0

The article, published in BJPSYCH INTERNATIONAL in August 2017, reports the findings of a survey of service users regarding their experiences of coercion and restraint in the UK and embeds this in the wider international and institutional environment. The article mentions efforts of ENUSP...

Study says Closapine is 37 times more dangerous than pharmaceutical companies admit

by OlgaKalina
30. October 2017
0

According to the study published in CNS Drugs on June 16, 2017, 37 out of 10,000 clozapine users have serious gastrointestinal hypomotility with clozapine the suspected cause, and at least 7 of them actually die (case fatality rate 18 %). Researchers say actual numbers...

Research says that trainings can change the staff attitudes towards coercion

by OlgaKalina
15. June 2019
0

An investigation on attitudes towards the use of coercion and mechanical restraint says it is possible to change the staff attitudes towards the use of coercion, e.g. mechanical restraint, through activating, diverse, and involving teaching. The staff in the research (122 staff members in...

England and Wales: The Mental Health Act isn’t working according to research published on 22 June 2017

by OlgaKalina
11. July 2017
0

Research published on 22 June 2017 by the Mental Health Alliance shows that Mental Health Act isn't working. The research includes the views of over 8000 people who use mental health services, carers, and professionals. Half of those who responded did not think that...

Load More

European Network of (Ex-)Users and Survivors of Psychiatry

ENUSP gives users and survivors of psychiatric services across Europe a way to communicate so that we can support one other in the personal, political, and social struggle against injustice and discrimination.

We are the only grassroots umbrella organization working across Europe to unite local and national organizations of (ex-) users and survivors of psychiatry.

We directly represent the views of people who are or have been on the receiving end of psychiatric services.

Contact us:

ENUSP

Store Glasvej 49

5000 Odense C

Denmark

enusp.info@gmail.com

© 2026 ENUSP - "Nothing about us without us"

Welcome Back!

OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

OR

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About us
    • Who are we?
    • Reports
    • Statutes
    • Board members
  • Our association
    • Where do we have influence
    • Our projects
      • Projects
      • Events
    • Members
      • Per country
      • Alphabetical list
      • Q&A
  • Get involved
    • Become a member
    • Become a volunteer/worker/activist
    • Make a donation
  • Contact us

© 2026 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.